News Briefs
Family planning schemes spread AIDS
BALTIMORE - A new study by the National Institutes of Health, University
of North Carolina and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore said that
international family planning schemes that promote the injected contraceptive
Depo-Provera has led to a worsening of the AIDS epidemic and spread
of other STDs in Africa, southeast Asia and South America. At first
glance, it may appear that the move away from condoms and to an injectable
contraceptive has led to more "unprotected" sex but Charles Morrison
of Family Health International in Research Triangle Park, N.C., who
led the study, said that it is possible that the drug itself actually
increases susceptibility to disease. The study says that the use of
such drugs can increase the risk of STD's as much as three-fold. Under
President Bill Clinton, USAID provided 41,967,200 units of Depo-Provera
to the developing world from 1994-2000, and the UNFPA distributed 20
million units with American taxpayer money. Stephen Mosher, president
of the Population Resarch Institute, said "As the HIV/AIDS epidemic
in Africa rages out of control, we have been recklessly promoting and
distributing drugs which make women even more vulnerable to the deadly
virus. We have been pouring gasoline on a fire."
Medical journals censor abortion info
CHICAGO - The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer criticized the censorship
of scientific research by The Lancet, the most influential
British medical journal, and Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention,
the main publication of the American Association for Cancer Research.
Both publications refused to publish letters from medical researchers
on the relationship between abortion and breast cancer. The Coalition's
president, Karen Malec, said "Recognition of the (abortion-breast cancer)
link could embarrass leading researchers and the cancer fundraising
industry. Nevertheless, the increasing incidence and importance of female
breast cancer merits the fullest scientific investigation and discussion."
Lancet refused a letters from two experts: Chris Kahlenborn,
author of Breast Cancer: It's Link to Abortion and the Birth Control
Pill, and Patrick Carroll, a British actuary and statistician and
the research director for the Pension and Population Research Institute
in London. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention rejected
a letter from Joel Brind, Ph.D., professor of endocrinology at Baruch
College, City University of New York.
Manitoba permits gay 'marriage'
WINNIPEG - Manitoba became the fifth Canadian jurisdiction to allow
same-sex "marriage" when the Court of Queen's Bench found the prohibition
against gays marrying one another to be unconstitutional. Justice Douglas
Yard said, "the traditional definition of marriage is no longer constitutionally
valid in view of the provisions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The traditional definition of marriage in Manitoba is reformulated to
mean a voluntary union for life of two persons at the exclusion of all
others." Unlike in B.C., Ontario and Quebec, the federal government
did not become involved in the case and following another case in the
Yukon earlier this year, the feds asked for a deferral to implement
the decision until the Supreme Court decided on the issue federally.
Lesbian divorce granted
TORONTO - The Ontario Superior Court granted the Canada's, and possibly
world's, same-sex divorce. The Interim reported last month
on the anonymous lesbian couple who sought divorce after being married
for only five days before separating. The court struck down the provision
of the Federal Divorce Act that defined spouse as a member of the opposite
sex, finding it "unconstitutional, inoperative and of no force and effect."
Martha McCarthy, a lawyer for one of the women, applauded the court's
willingness to scrap the law to advance gay rights but Gwen Landolt,
vice president and legal counsel of REAL Women said the lesbian couple
used the court "to perpetrate the scam" marriage and "the courts are
totally obliging." The decision applies only to Ontario residents. A
Globe and Mail editorial said that divorce law was still ambiguous
regarding homosexual couples and urged the federal government to clarify
the divorce rights of homosexuals when it redefines marriage.