Ontario PCs choose liberal leader
Paul Tuns
The Interim
In September, the Ontario Progressive Conservative party chose socially
liberal John Tory over two self-described pro-lifers, to be its new
leader. But small-c conservatives say that Tory's social liberalism
and unimpressive track record could be liabilities in Ontario's October
2007 provincial election.
Tory
narrowly defeated former finance minister and Whitby-Ajax MPP Jim Flaherty
54 per cent to 46 per cent on the second ballot. Former transportation
minister and Oak Ridges MPP Frank Klees scored a surprising 23 per cent
of the electoral points in the first ballot, but not enough of his supporters
backed Flaherty to put him over the top in the second round.
Klees and Flaherty both also supported choice in education, with Flaherty
being a long-time champion of the rights of parents, since he implemented
the now-rescinded Education Tuition Tax Credit while he was finance
minister under Mike Harris.
Campaign Life Coalition national president Jim Hughes noted that social
conservatives demonstrated they were a force within the leadership race.
He pointed to the fact that Flaherty and Klees garnered 55 per cent
of the first ballot electoral points. Hughes expressed disappointment
that so many Klees supporters backed Tory on the second ballot.
But while Tory was able to pull off a victory in the leadership contest,
some are wondering whether he will replicate this success in a provincial
election. One Progressive Conservative strategist reminded The Interim
that Tory has an unimpressive track record. As an adviser to former
Ontario premier William Davis, Tory engineered the provincial takeover
of Suncorp, which ended up as a financial fiasco for the province.
Tory was campaign manager for Larry Grossman's losing provincial campaign
in 1987 which was the worst showing for the Ontario PC in their history.
Tory followed this electoral disaster with an even worse campaign when
he managed Kim Campbell's ill-fated federal campaign in 1993. An election
which saw the PC wiped out but for two seats.
Tory's supporters invariably pointed to "moderation" and "electability"
as his most important assets. But as one conservative activist observed,
it is noteworthy that many socially liberal PCs said the same thing
about Ernie Eves in 2002, 17 months before he led his party into an
election that saw them reduced to a mere 24 seats. And as Andrew Coyne
points out in a recent column in the National Post, John Tory is the
second consecutive Ontario PC Leader to have received the support of
the Toronto Star in the leadership contest.
Tory's "moderation" included support for same-sex "marriage," a pro-abortion
position and ambivalence to educational choice. Indeed, the day after
Tory assumed the leadership, EGALE, a gay rights advocacy group, congratulated
the new PC leader and thanked the party for choosing a leader sympathetic
to their cause.
REAL Women of Canada, however, warned that, "Tory will not have the
support of social conservatives" because he crossed the line in supporting
same-sex "marriage." REAL Women questioned the wisdom of ignoring social
conservatives - the "bedrock of the party" - in a fruitless search for
an insignificant number of homosexual votes.
"By throwing his lot in with the homosexual activists to the detriment
of society and the social conservatives within the party," warned REAL
Women's Gwen Landolt, "Tory has detrimentally affected his electoral
chances" and divided "his party over the homosexual issue."
Family Coalition Party leader Giuseppe Gori told The Interim that the
PC voters' choice of Tory as leader "leaves more political space" for
his party, noting that it is the only place for small-c conservatives
to park their votes.
Gori said that with Tory at the helm, the PCs have not just abandoned
social conservatives, but all conservatives. He referred to Tory's tepid
endorsement of education and medical choice, and tax reduction.
Gori is convinced that the FCP can garner unprecedented support in
the next election as it attracts new supporters dissatisfied with the
PCs move to the political left.
CLC's Jim Hughes told The Interim that while he is disappointed with
the outcome, it does not ultimately affect his organization's political
strategy of supporting pro-life candidates regardless of party.
Hughes said while it might be more difficult to get voters enthusiastic
for local pro-life PCs, CLC has had trouble getting supporters behind
pro-life Liberals because of that party's recent pro-abortion leaders.
But Hughes stressed leader and party labels are not as important as
close scrutiny of local candidates.