Bush, Kerry provide stark choice on abortion
Paul Tuns The Interim
On Nov. 2, Americans will go to the polls to elect a president, 435
representatives and one-third of the Senate, not to mention thousands
of state and local level politicians. With fewer than 30 Congressional
races considered close and only a dozen Senate races being seriously
contested, most of the attention is on the presidential race. This is
especially true for pro-life and pro-family voters as the stakes have
never seemed larger.
As
the National Right to Life Committee has noted (see chart on page 12),
it is virtually impossible to have two candidates more apart on abortion.
President George W. Bush believes the rights of the unborn need to be
protected and he has signed legislation banning partial-birth abortion,
protecting infants who are born alive and protecting unborn victims
of violence. He supports a ban on human cloning and opposes federal
funding of abortion.
Bush's opponent, Senator John Kerry (D, Mass.), supports abortion and
embryonic stem cell research. He tried to reach out to uncommitted moderate
and Catholic voters in the so-called battleground or swing states (for
example, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Missouri, Wisconsin and Florida) by saying
that he thought life began at conception but he still favoured "a woman's
right to choose." The gambit didn't work, earning him instead the ridicule
of pro-life and pro-abortion activists who wondered how he could admit
pre-natal life is human but unworthy of protection.
Realizing that using abortion as a wedge issue is not a successful
tactic in the United States -even former president Bill Clinton told
Rolling Stone magazine this summer that if the election hinged on cultural
issues such as abortion and gay "marriage" the Democrats would lose
-Kerry turned to embryonic stem cell research. Kerry has repeatedly
returned to this theme, painting Bush as uncaring. The Democrats recruited
Ron Reagan Jr., the son of the former president who died in June following
a decade-long battle with Alzheimer's, to speak in favour of funding
ESCR.
Polling does not indicate that ESCR is registering as an electoral
issue but two other social issues do. The issue of appointing judges
moves the party faithful on both sides. Bush has named numerous pro-life
judges to the bench, many of them vigorously opposed by Senate Democrats.
Such battles will heat up when Supreme Court justices retire, with two
and maybe three expected to leave in the next five years.
The other cultural issue that is resonating with voters is gay "marriage"
and although both say they oppose redefining marriage, Kerry is opposed
to any measure that would protect marriage from judicial or state-level
redefinition.
Furthermore, while the war for Iraq, the war on terror and the economy
are the predominant issues, the actions of the candidates and polling
of voters does show that social issues matter. During the Republican
convention, Bush said "Because a caring society will value its weakest
members, we must make a place for the unborn child." In a Sept. 22 speech
at the United Nations, Bush reiterated his call for a comprehensive
international ban on cloning.
Bill Clinton might be right that if the election is decided by social
issues, the Democrats will lose. At least that would explain why Kerry
has fudged his abortion and marriage positions and is now asserting
that he holds conservative values.