Family advocacy group
breaks through stonewalling
By Tony Gosgnach
The Interim
A
Hamilton family advocacy group has broken through about three years
of stonewalling by the city's public health department and the Ontario
Ministry of Health to gain access to all aspects of teen pregnancy statistics
in the city.
At a hearing before the Information and Privacy Commission of Ontario
on Dec. 18, IPCO ruled that the Ministry of Health must provide provincial
data on the matter to the Hamilton-Wentworth Family Action Council immediately,
and that the Hamilton public health department must likewise give its
statistics when asked to do so.
HWFAC vice-president Jim Enos said the provincial data has since been
provided and a written request submitted to the Hamilton public health
department for city data.
"It's positive," he said of the development. "Basically, (the information
and privacy) commission is saying, 'What's the big secret? Why is it
not public data?'"
Enos characterized the relationship between the Hamilton public health
department and the Ontario Ministry of Health as " a secret club." He
added that the suppression of data related to teen pregnancy didn't
allow the public or watchdog groups such as his own to assess how well
those two entities were doing with respect to battling the problem of
teen pregnancy.
Teen pregnancy rates, and information related to them, were readily
available to the public until 1996, when they became covered under provisions
of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. That move
put a roadblock in the way of efforts by organizations such as Enos's
to combat what they saw as the failed "safe sex" approaches of the public
health department and the Ministry of Health.
"Analyzing teen pregnancy rate trends to determine the effectiveness
of sexual health programs became virtually impossible for any group
outside public health and the Ministry of Health," said Enos. "Public
health had free rein to experiment with our youths and spin tales about
their great success, while concealing the truth about the disastrous
results."
During the Dec. 18 hearing, the HWFAC presented evidence of "questionable
behaviour" by the Ministry of Health over the three years that teen
pregnancy data was suppressed. The commission accepted the arguments.
"It is our position that this data should be readily available and
with a time lag not exceeding two years, which was the case prior to
1996, in order that the effectiveness of sex education programs be determined
as soon as possible," said Enos.
He added that the next step is a presentation before Hamilton's social
services committee this month, in which he again plans to drive home
the inefficacy, and downright danger, of "safe sex" approaches to teen
pregnancy.
"Although the situation in public health clinics is not great, it's
a lot cleaner than it was," he said, referring to years past when explicit
posters and promotion of condoms were the norm in city facilities.
Although a new administration has taken control in Hamilton following
municipal elections last November, Enos is not overly enchanted with
some of the new politicians on city council.
He noted that although new mayor Larry DiIanni is a former Catholic
high school principal, the new city chief told Enos in a phone conversation
several years ago - while DiIanni was a city councillor - that, "I may
have been a Catholic school principal, but I don't necessarily adhere
to all the doctrines of the church."
However, DiIanni seemed to come around somewhat after subsequent approaches
by the HWFAC and agreed that he wanted "something that works" with respect
to sexual health programs in the city.
The HWFAC has prepared a fact sheet, in which it compares the claims
of the Hamilton public health department to the truth. The analyses
show, according to Enos, that the less young people see of public health
in Hamilton, the better they fare with respect to sexual health.